Register / Login

Loading...

India High Range Landscape Project

Issues

Consultation and disclosure

Description: Complaint raises concerns regarding inadequate or absent consultation about or disclosure of project information, including project impacts and/or mitigation plans.

Complaints with this Issue: 550

Browse Complaints

Corruption/fraud

Description: Complaint raises concerns about corruption and/or fraud related to the project. Most IAMs cannot address corruption or fraud concerns.

Complaints with this Issue: 70

Browse Complaints

Due diligence

Description: Complaint raises concerns about inadequate or absent prior investigation of project impacts.

Complaints with this Issue: 484

Browse Complaints

Other

Description: Complaint raises concerns about impacts that do not fit in one of the other categories. Complaints about which there is no publicly available information regarding the issues raised are also included.

Complaints with this Issue: 235

Browse Complaints

Sectors

Conservation and environmental protection

Description: Project relates to preservation or management of the natural environment, legal frameworks regarding environmental protection or pollution, and carbon sequestration or other climate change mitigation activities.

Complaints in this Sector: 66

Browse Complaints

Land reform

Description: Project relates to development of or changes to legal frameworks regarding land tenure.

Complaints in this Sector: 25

Browse Complaints

Project

Name: India High Range Landscape Project

Investments: UNDP

Client:

Support: Advisory services

Country: India

Complaint

IAM: Stakeholder Response Mechanism and Social and Environmental Compliance Unit (SECU)

ID: SECU0001, SRM0001

Date Filed: Dec. 10, 2015

Date Closed: Jan. 31, 2018

Status: Closed With Outputs

Description

The complaints state concern that, among other things, there was improper consultation and exclusion of relevant stakeholders during the design and formulation of the project. It expresses concern that stakeholders' rights, such as the requirement of Free, Prior, Informed Consent and certain relevant national laws, were not properly adhered to when formulating the project. The complainant further states that people potentially affected by the project protest and are apathetic to the project, and that the project documentation improperly refers to relevant lands as protected areas when in fact they are not.

Complaint Stages

Filing

Dec. 10, 2015

Filing

Status:

Start Date: Dec. 10, 2015

Registration

Dec. 10, 2015 -

Dec. 16, 2015

Registration

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: Dec. 10, 2015

End Date: Dec. 16, 2015

Eligibility

March 1, 2016 -

Nov. 8, 2016

Eligibility

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: March 1, 2016

End Date: Nov. 8, 2016

Dispute Resolution

April 18, 2016 -

Nov. 3, 2017

Dispute Resolution

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: April 18, 2016

End Date: Nov. 3, 2017

Compliance Review

Aug. 26, 2016 -

Nov. 28, 2016

Compliance Review

Status: Closed With Output

Start Date: Aug. 26, 2016

End Date: Nov. 28, 2016

Has Compliance Report: Yes

Non-Compliance Found: Yes

Monitoring

Not Undertaken

Monitoring

Status: Not Undertaken

Explanation: Outside of mandate

Closed

Jan. 31, 2018

Timeline